Current Archive Forum News Contribute Advertise Subscribe About
Jobs

Archive - 2001

Would you like to
see your work here?
Contribute
and reach
45,000 psychologists!


 

Search the Archive:
Powered by Google
TickFree Online Access
Padlock Membership of the Society Required

 

Open Access - No Logon Required Volume 14 - Part 10 - (October 2001)

State of the art - Consciousness

Is a bat conscious? Susan Blackmore argues that there must be something radically wrong with the way we are currently thinking about consciousness, or we would not find ourselves with seemingly intractable problems.

Pages: 522-525

Download PDF View the complete article as a PDF document
(Please note that some pictures may have been removed for copyright reasons)
Discussion Forum Discuss this article in our forum

WHAT is it like to be a bat? This is the question asked by philosopher Thomas Nagel in his famous 1974 paper. As he explains, if there is something it is like to be the bat – something for the bat – then the bat is conscious. That is what we mean by consciousness. Ask ‘what is it like to be a stone?’ and most people will reply ‘nothing’. Ask ‘what is it like to be my best friend?’ and most people will have a good guess – we believe there is something it is like to be another person. The interesting problems start when we ask about babies, computers or other species. This is why Nagel chose the bat, with its complex world of reflected sounds. The bat’s world must be very different from ours; but surely it has subjective experiences, doesn’t it? This is the question.


The Psychologist Home | Accessibility | Text Only | Site Map | Contact Us | BPS Website

© Copyright 2000-2010 The British Psychological Society
The British Psychological Society is a charity registered in England and Wales, Registration Number : 229642 and a charity registered in Scotland, Registration Number : SC039452 - VAT Registration Number : 240 3937 76

End Page