Current Archive Contribute Advertise Subscribe About

Archive - 2001

Would you like to
see your work here?
and reach
45,000 psychologists!

Open Access - No Logon Required Volume 14 - Part 3 - (March 2001)

Genetics and behaviour - peer commentary

Robert Plomin argues that psychologists should prepare to maximise the benefits and minimise the risks that will emerge from DNA research. Commentaries are provided by Martin Richards, Jonathan Flint, Steven Rose, Anita Thapar and Jane Holmes, Theresa Marteau and Andrew Wilkie.

Pages: 134-153

ASK any psychologist to complete the following phrase: ‘nature–nurture _________’. The answer will no doubt be ‘debate’ or ‘controversy’. But the controversy that swirled around behavioural genetics research in psychology during the 1970s has largely faded. During the 1980s and, especially, the 1990s, psychology became much more accepting of genetic influence, as can be seen in the increasing number of behavioural genetic articles in mainstream psychology journals and in research grants. One symbol of this change was the 1992 centennial conference of the American Psychological Association. In preparation for the conference, a committee selected two themes that best represented the past, present, and future of psychology. One of the two themes chosen was behavioural genetics (Plomin & McClearn, 1993). In my view, this choice represents one of the most dramatic shifts in the modern history of psychology. Indeed, the wave of acceptance of genetic influence in psychology is growing into a tidal wave that threatens to engulf key messages coming from behavioural genetic research. The first message is that genes play a surprisingly important role throughout psychology. But the second message is just as important: individual differences in complex psychological traits are due at least as much to environmental influences as they are to genetic influences. In fact, behavioural genetic research provides the strongest available evidence for the importance of environmental factors. But in some areas of psychology, especially psychopathology, the pendulum representing the accepted view may be swinging too far from environmental determinism to genetic determinism.

Download PDF View the complete article as a PDF document
(Please note that some pictures may have been removed for copyright reasons)
Discussion Forum Discuss this article in our forum
Buy an article for your publication Buy an article for your publication

The Psychologist Home | Accessibility | Text Only | Site Map | Contact Us | BPS Website

© Copyright 2000-2014 The British Psychological Society
The British Psychological Society is a charity registered in England and Wales, Registration Number : 229642 and a charity registered in Scotland, Registration Number : SC039452 - VAT Registration Number : 240 3937 76

End Page